Thursday, August 04, 2016

Tech Talk: The Ichimoku Cloud


By Peter McKenzie-Brown
Japanese journalist Goichi Hosoda developed the ichimoku cloud and published the idea in the late 1960s. It interprets information taken from candlestick charting.

The body of this chart suppresses all the usual indicators I use, to highlight the Ichimoku cloud, which is what I want to illustrate. The cloud itself consists of pink and green patterns, but it also has indicator lines in blue, red and green.

In this case, it applies to Fossil Group Inc. (FOSL), the purveyor of consumer fashions and accessories under labels such as Fossil, Diesel, Adidas and Burberry. Since October 2014, its share price has dropped by more than $100 – $60 since last August. Today the share has a price-to-book of 1.5, and a 20-per-cent return on equity. In fundamental terms, that makes it quite attractive.

Full disclosure: I recently bought some, based on the stock’s double bottom (share prices are now trading through the resistance they established last January 20th) and the little green cloud on the far right of the chart.

The trend is up when prices are above the cloud’s future-based projection, down when prices are below the cloud and flat when they are in the cloud itself. The cloud is the most prominent feature of the Ichimoku Cloud plots.

There are two ways to identify overall trend using the cloud. The trend is up when prices are above the cloud, down when prices are below it and flat when prices are within. Techies see the uptrend as stronger when the green cloud line is rising and above the red cloud line. This situation produces a green cloud. Conversely, they worry when the green line is falling and below the red line – a situation which produces a pink cloud. Because the cloud projects activity 26 days into the future, it offers a glimpse of future support or resistance. In this case, the green cloud seems to suggest that prices are about to rise. 

Of course, I could be wrong. I never make buy or sell recommendations.

Wednesday, August 03, 2016

Tech Talk: Bollinger Bands



By Peter McKenzie-Brown

In this chart I have stripped away everything except the candlesticks showing daily trades, trading volume, and Bollinger Bands.

Before I explain why this is significant, let me offer you the caution that the underlying asset here – an ETF covering calls on the Canadian banks – is risky, and fees can be high. To understand the risks, please click on the attachment.

Bollinger Bands consist of a centre line and two price channels (bands) above and below it. The centre line is an exponential moving average; the price channels are standard deviations of the stock under study. The bands expand and contract as the price action of an issue becomes volatile (expansion) or becomes bound into a tight trading pattern (contraction).    

In the 1980s, John Bollinger, a long-time market technician, developed the technique of using a moving average with two trading bands above and below it. Unlike a percentage calculation from a normal moving average, Bollinger Bands simply add and subtract a standard deviation calculation – essentially, a mathematical formula that measures volatility, showing how the stock price can vary from its “true value.” In 2001 he published an excellent book on the system, titled Bollinger on Bollinger Bands. You can download it as a PDF here.

Bollinger considers his eponymous instrument as the primary tool in a system he calls “rational analysis.” That system, he says, combines “technical analysis and fundamental analysis in a relative framework.”

By measuring price volatility, Bollinger Bands adjust themselves to market conditions. This is what makes them so handy for traders: they can organize relevant price data between two bands in such a way that they give you a sense of when to sell, and when to buy. Selling when the asset is close to the top band makes sense. Similarly, if you like an asset, you should buy when it’s close to the bottom.


Of course, nothing in this note in any way constitutes a buy-or-sell recommendation.